 |
| Are you planning to upgrade to VB.NET? |
| No, I'll continue using VB 6 or earlier |
   |
9 |
39.13% |
| Yes, Planning on it |
   |
6 |
26.09% |
| Already upgraded, Loving It |
   |
7 |
30.43% |
| Already upgraded, but I hate it |
   |
1 |
4.35% |
| Total Votes |
23 |
100% |
|
pavane Level: VB Lord
 Registered: 26-04-2004 Posts: 181
|
Re: From VB6 to VB.NET
What benefits will I obtain?
Will my music program become multi-platform?
At present it is Windows only, and I have had many requests for LINUX or MAC versions.
Will I be able to run it on my web site?
Will I be able to use the custom controls (for example, those required for MIDI sound) or are there likely to be VB.NET versions?
The last migration I did, from VB3 to VB5, took 9 months for c90k lines of code. Is it likely that VB5 to VB.NET take longer?
Until I know some answers, I cannot make this decision.
|
|
26-01-2006 at 10:25 AM |
|
|
stickleprojects Level: Moderator

 Registered: 09-09-2002 Posts: 1040
|
Re: From VB6 to VB.NET
Hi,
comments inserted:
quote: What benefits will I obtain?
See prev. email.. but note that in order to take full advantage you may have to recode some stuff
quote: Will my music program become multi-platform?
At present it is Windows only, and I have had many requests for LINUX or MAC versions.
I beleive that the CLR (.NET platform) works on unix/mac, but don't know for sure
quote: Will I be able to run it on my web site?
Probably. What is it? Is it an ActiveX? If so, without porting, then still probably (depending on the support of the browser), if with porting then still may need support on browser.. note pure java vm is not clr/.net
quote: Will I be able to use the custom controls (for example, those required for MIDI sound) or are there likely to be VB.NET versions?
I believe not, the .NET/clr platform requires you to use these as classes rather than controls.
quote: The last migration I did, from VB3 to VB5, took 9 months for c90k lines of code. Is it likely that VB5 to VB.NET take longer?
I don't know your code, so cannot comment. To take full advantage of .net, you may need to rewrite most of your code to take advantage of the new stuff. A straight port (if you get it to work ) will go through yet another layer of translation before it gets to the clr, so will be slower.
Suggest you actually look into issues on sites like codeproject and msdn for issues with the tech you're using in vb5 (examples : interfaces, classes, inheritance, ado, interop)
ps Interop is the term for any .net app communicating with non-.net (ie. .net vs com) - this is slower than pure .net/clr
Hope this helps
Kieron
____________________________
Build it better, faster, quicker, easier.. then fix it (non-offical MS mission statement)
|
|
27-01-2006 at 12:48 AM |
|
|
Nick2k3 Level: Big Cheese
 Registered: 23-11-2003 Posts: 25
|
Re: From VB6 to VB.NET
I had a feeling that i already posted against VB Net before....anyway if i was opposing before, then i take back whatever i said because VB NET is just so AMAZING!!!
____________________________
Error 404 ...File not found...!!!!
|
|
29-09-2006 at 07:32 PM |
|
|
iliekater Level: Master
 Registered: 04-02-2005 Posts: 134
|
Re: From VB6 to VB.NET
I would like to take the great decision too , but I am too old to learn a new language ... As the priest sais : Together in life , together to death . By the way : which button do I have to press in order to vote ?
[Edited by iliekater on 01-12-2006 at 02:02 PM GMT]
|
|
01-12-2006 at 10:00 PM |
|
|
SteveS Level: Trainee
 Registered: 29-07-2007 Posts: 2
|
Re: From VB6 to VB.NET
Every once in a while i try .net. It feels really slow.
Slow to write
Slow to debug
Slow to compile
Slow to learn
Maybe i had a hard time learning VB6 and forgot. But it seems like VB6 was realy easy to learn, write etc. Maybe my problem is the order i listed stuff in (write before learning).
|
|
29-07-2007 at 08:20 PM |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |